Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Credit Scoring and Rating

A risk analyst compares two ways of assigning credit ratings to corporate bonds. Rating Agency A states that its ratings are meant to reflect a borrower's creditworthiness over a full economic cycle and are changed only when the agency believes a credit's long-term risk profile has changed. Which description best fits this approach?

The approach is through-the-cycle rating. It assesses creditworthiness over a whole economic cycle and changes ratings only when the long-term risk profile shifts, which makes ratings stable. Point-in-time ratings, by contrast, respond to current conditions and migrate more often.

  1. AThrough-the-cycle rating philosophyCorrect
  2. BPoint-in-time rating philosophy
  3. CMarket-implied rating philosophy
  4. DStructural-model rating philosophy

Explanation

A through-the-cycle approach looks past temporary swings in the economy and rates on the borrower's long-run, stressed-cycle risk profile, giving stable ratings. A point-in-time approach would instead use current conditions and change frequently. Market-implied and structural approaches rely on market prices or asset values, not a stated long-cycle view.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Credit Scoring and Rating shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Credit Scoring and Rating questions