Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Measurement and Assessment

A risk analyst fits a severity model to internal loss data and finds that the largest few losses far exceed what a lognormal fit predicts, so the tail appears heavier. Which approach is most appropriate for improving the estimate of high quantiles?

The best approach is to model exceedances over a high threshold with a generalized Pareto distribution, using extreme value theory. It targets tail behavior directly. Deleting the largest losses would understate capital, and improving body fit does not fix the heavy tail.

  1. AFit a generalized Pareto distribution to losses exceeding a high threshold, using peaks-over-threshold extreme value theoryCorrect
  2. BReplace the severity distribution with a normal distribution fitted to the log of the frequency
  3. CRemove the largest losses as outliers and refit the lognormal
  4. DLower the collection threshold to zero so the lognormal fits the body better

Explanation

Peaks-over-threshold with a generalized Pareto distribution is designed to model tail behavior above a high threshold and handle heavy tails. Removing large losses understates capital, and lowering the collection threshold addresses body data, not tail shape. A normal on log frequency is conceptually confused.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Measurement and Assessment shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Measurement and Assessment questions