FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Portfolio Credit Risk
A risk analyst uses the Vasicek single-factor model for a large homogeneous loan portfolio. She holds each obligor's PD and LGD fixed and raises the common asset correlation from 0.10 to 0.30. Which outcome is most likely?
Expected loss stays the same because it depends only on PD, LGD and exposure. A higher asset correlation makes defaults cluster around the systematic factor, which fattens the loss tail, so the 99.9% loss quantile rises.
- AExpected portfolio loss is unchanged, but the 99.9% loss quantile risesCorrect
- BExpected portfolio loss rises, and the 99.9% loss quantile is unchanged
- CExpected portfolio loss falls, because defaults become more predictable
- DBoth expected loss and the 99.9% loss quantile are unchanged, because PD is fixed
Explanation
Expected loss depends on PD, LGD and exposure, so changing correlation leaves it alone. Higher correlation increases the weight of the systematic factor and fattens the tail of the default-rate distribution. The 99.9% quantile therefore rises.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Portfolio Credit Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Portfolio Credit Risk questions
- A bank holds a single loan with exposure at default of USD 10 million, a one-year probability of default of 2%, and loss given default of 40…
- Holding PD and confidence level fixed, a risk manager raises the asset correlation parameter in a Vasicek large homogeneous portfolio model …
- A bank uses a KMV-type (Moody's KMV Portfolio Manager) approach to estimating default probabilities. A firm has asset value of 140, default …
- A bank's loan portfolio has a large exposure to a single regional energy producer, producing high name concentration. The credit risk manage…
- A bank's credit portfolio has an expected loss of USD 30 million. The 99.9% quantile of the portfolio loss distribution is USD 210 million. …
- A bank's credit portfolio has a standalone unexpected loss (UL) of 40 for Loan A (exposure 400) and 30 for Loan B. The portfolio UL is 55. L…