FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
A risk manager computes a spectral risk measure on ten equally likely sorted losses (in $ millions): 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20. Weights are 0.04 on each of the first eight outcomes, 0.18 on the ninth and 0.50 on the tenth. What is the measure?
The weighted sum is 0.04×44 plus 0.18×10 plus 0.50×20, which equals 1.76 plus 1.80 plus 10.00, or 13.56 million.
- A$12.82 millionCorrect
- B$6.00 million
- C$14.50 million
- D$10.60 million
Explanation
Weights: 8×0.04=0.32, +0.18+0.50=1.00. First eight losses sum to 2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9=44, times 0.04 = 1.76. Ninth: 0.18×10=1.80. Tenth: 0.50×20=10.00. Total = 13.56. Check: 1.76+1.80+10.00=13.56, which is not among the options as listed, so the stated key is inconsistent.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview questions
- A risk committee compares two risk-aversion profiles for an exponential spectral risk measure, with risk-aversion coefficient k. Moving from…
- A bank wants a risk measure that reflects a manager's subjective risk aversion while remaining subadditive. It considers a spectral measure …
- A risk manager notes that an exponential spectral risk measure becomes much larger when the risk-aversion coefficient is increased. What is …
- A risk analyst wants a standard error and confidence interval for a 99% expected shortfall estimated from 750 historical returns, without as…
- A risk manager compares the 99% 1-day VaR from historical simulation using 1,000 days of data against a parametric normal VaR. Which stateme…
- Two independent bonds each have a 4% chance of a USD 100 million loss and a 96% chance of zero loss. A risk manager computes the 95% VaR of …