Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · VaR Mapping

A risk manager is building a VaR system for a large bond portfolio containing thousands of different bonds. Which approach best describes the principle of mapping the portfolio to risk factors?

Fixed-income mapping replaces each bond's cash flows with positions in a small set of standardized zero-coupon vertices. This reduces the number of risk factors needing volatility and correlation estimates, making VaR computation feasible for large portfolios while still capturing term-structure risk.

  1. AReplace each bond's cash flows with positions in a small set of standardized vertices of the zero-coupon curveCorrect
  2. BModel each bond individually with its own volatility estimate from its price history
  3. CExclude all bonds with maturities that do not match a benchmark vertex
  4. DConvert every bond into a single position in the overnight rate

Explanation

Mapping decomposes each bond into cash flows and allocates them to standard vertices, so only a limited number of risk factors need volatility and correlation estimates. Modeling each bond separately is infeasible with thousands of bonds, and excluding bonds or using a single overnight rate discards risk information.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on VaR Mapping shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More VaR Mapping questions