FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Portfolio Risk: Analytical Methods
A risk manager is considering adding a new position to a portfolio. She wants the exact change in portfolio VaR from adding the whole position, rather than a linear approximation. Which measure should she use?
She should use incremental VaR, the difference between portfolio VaR with and without the new position. It captures the full effect of a large trade, whereas marginal VaR is only a linear approximation for small changes and standalone VaR ignores diversification.
- AIncremental VaR, computed as VaR with the position minus VaR without itCorrect
- BMarginal VaR, multiplied by the position size
- CComponent VaR of the existing positions
- DStandalone VaR of the new position
Explanation
Incremental VaR is the full revaluation difference between portfolio VaR with and without the position, so it captures nonlinearity. Marginal VaR times size is only a first-order approximation, valid for small changes. Standalone VaR ignores diversification.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Portfolio Risk: Analytical Methods shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Portfolio Risk: Analytical Methods questions
- A portfolio's VaR is $10 million. Position X has a component VaR of $6 million and a standalone VaR of $5 million. Which conclusion is most …
- A portfolio manager's fund returns exceeded the benchmark's returns by the following amounts over four periods: +2%, -1%, +3%, 0%. Ignoring …
- A risk manager decomposes a portfolio's variance using a multifactor model and finds that 70% of variance is explained by common factors. Th…
- A bank's parametric VaR relies on a correlation matrix estimated from a calm two-year period. In a market crisis, correlations among the ban…
- A risk manager decomposes portfolio VaR into component VaRs, each equal to the position's weight multiplied by its marginal VaR, and finds t…
- A risk manager compares ex-ante tracking error forecasts of 3.0% for a long-only equity fund with the realized tracking error of 4.5% over t…