Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Capital Markets Activities

A risk manager notes that a generative AI tool used to summarise regulatory changes sometimes produces confident but fabricated citations. Which risk control is most appropriate before relying on its output for compliance decisions?

The firm should require human verification of the tool's citations against original regulatory documents and keep logs of outputs. Generative models can produce fluent but fabricated references, so fluency or self-reported confidence is not reliable evidence of accuracy. Making the tool more creative would increase the risk.

  1. ARequire human verification of cited sources against original documents, with logging of outputsCorrect
  2. BIncrease the tool's creativity setting to broaden coverage
  3. CAccept outputs that sound authoritative without review
  4. DLimit review to outputs the tool itself rates as low-confidence

Explanation

Fabricated outputs, or hallucinations, are a known generative AI risk. Human verification against original sources, with logging for audit, directly mitigates it. Fluent wording is no evidence of accuracy, and the model's self-rated confidence is unreliable.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Capital Markets Activities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Capital Markets Activities questions