FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Simulation and Bootstrapping
A risk manager runs a Monte Carlo experiment with N = 10,000 and obtains a standard error of 0.50 for an option price estimate. She applies antithetic variates, which reduces the standard deviation of the estimator by 40% at the same N. With the reduced variance, what number of simulations of the original (plain) method would give the same standard error as the improved estimator at N = 10,000?
About 27,778 plain simulations. Antithetic variates cut the standard error from 0.50 to 0.30. Since error scales with one over the square root of N, the plain method needs (0.50/0.30) squared, about 2.778 times as many trials, so 10,000 x 2.778 is roughly 27,778.
- A16,000
- B27,778Correct
- C36,000
- D25,000
Explanation
New standard error = 0.50 x 0.60 = 0.30. Plain method needs 0.50 x sqrt(10,000/N) = 0.30, so sqrt(N/10,000) = 0.50/0.30 = 1.6667, N = 10,000 x 2.7778 = 27,778.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Simulation and Bootstrapping shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Simulation and Bootstrapping questions
- A Monte Carlo simulation estimates an option price with a standard error of 0.40 using 2,500 independent trials. The analyst wants the stand…
- A Monte Carlo analyst compares a simulation using antithetic variates with one using the same number of independent draws. Which statement b…
- A bank bootstraps a sample of 40 annual returns of a thinly traded emerging-market index to estimate the 95% confidence interval for mean re…
- In a Monte Carlo simulation of a stock price over one year using geometric Brownian motion, S0 = 100, drift mu = 8%, volatility sigma = 20%,…
- Which statement about variance reduction techniques in Monte Carlo simulation is most accurate?
- A risk analyst bootstraps a sample of 500 daily portfolio losses to estimate 95% VaR. She draws 1,000 resamples (each of 500 observations, w…