FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
A risk team estimates the 95% VaR of a portfolio and obtains USD 10.0 million. They then compute a 90% confidence interval of USD 8.5 million to USD 11.5 million. The team's head then asks for a 99% confidence interval for the same VaR, using the same sample and normal approximation (critical values 1.645 for 90% and 2.576 for 99%). What is the approximate 99% interval?
The approximate 99% interval is USD 7.65 million to USD 12.35 million. The 90% half-width of 1.5 implies a standard error of about 0.912, and multiplying by 2.576 gives a half-width of about 2.35 around the USD 10.0 million estimate. Using the 95% multiplier would understate the width.
- AUSD 7.65 million to USD 12.35 millionCorrect
- BUSD 8.01 million to USD 11.99 million
- CUSD 7.07 million to USD 12.93 million
- DUSD 6.50 million to USD 13.50 million
Explanation
The 90% half-width is 1.5 = 1.645 × SE, so SE ≈ 0.912. The 99% half-width = 2.576 × 0.912 ≈ 2.349, but equivalently 1.5 × 2.576/1.645 = 2.349. Hmm: this gives 10 ± 2.35 = 7.65 to 12.35. Option B scales by 1.96/1.645 (95% instead of 99%). Option C uses a multiplier of 3.29/1.645 (wrong ratio of about 2.0). Option D adds a flat 1.0 million.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview questions
- A desk's estimated one-day 99% VaR is 3.00% of portfolio value, with an estimated standard error of 0.20%. Assuming the estimator is approxi…
- A risk analyst uses 500 daily P&L observations to estimate 1-day 95% historical simulation VaR. Which statement best describes how the estim…
- A risk analyst plots the quantiles of a sample of daily portfolio returns (vertical axis) against the quantiles of a standard normal distrib…
- A risk analyst estimates one-day historical-simulation VaR from the same 1,000-day return sample at both the 95% and the 99% confidence leve…
- A risk committee compares two risk-aversion profiles for an exponential spectral risk measure, with risk-aversion coefficient k. Moving from…
- A bank wants a risk measure that reflects a manager's subjective risk aversion while remaining subadditive. It considers a spectral measure …