FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
A desk's estimated one-day 99% VaR is 3.00% of portfolio value, with an estimated standard error of 0.20%. Assuming the estimator is approximately normally distributed, which is the 95% confidence interval for the true VaR?
The interval is roughly 2.61% to 3.39%. For a two-sided 95% confidence interval under approximate normality, add and subtract 1.96 standard errors, which is 1.96 x 0.20% = 0.392%, around the 3.00% estimate.
- A2.61% to 3.39%Correct
- B2.67% to 3.33%
- C2.80% to 3.20%
- D2.40% to 3.60%
Explanation
A 95% two-sided interval uses 1.96 standard errors: 1.96 x 0.20% = 0.392%. The interval is 3.00% ± 0.392%, or 2.61% to 3.39%. The 2.67%-3.33% option wrongly uses 1.645, the one-sided 95% value, and 2.40%-3.60% uses 3 standard errors.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview questions
- An analyst compares the quantiles of a sample of loss data with those of a reference distribution in a QQ plot. The plotted points form an a…
- A risk analyst wants a standard error and confidence interval for a 99% expected shortfall estimated from 750 historical returns, without as…
- A bank computes 1-day 99% historical simulation VaR using the last 250 daily returns on a portfolio worth USD 100 million. The three worst r…
- A risk manager compares the 99% 1-day VaR from historical simulation using 1,000 days of data against a parametric normal VaR. Which stateme…
- A risk analyst plots the ordered daily returns of a portfolio against the corresponding quantiles of a standard normal distribution. The poi…
- Two independent bonds each have a 4% chance of a USD 100 million loss and a 96% chance of zero loss. A risk manager computes the 95% VaR of …