Skip to content

CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Protection of Plant Varieties

A seed company in Hyderabad develops a variety by taking an existing registered maize variety and changing one minor trait. The new variety is clearly distinguishable from the initial variety but otherwise retains the expression of its essential characteristics. Under the Act's definition, how is the new variety best classified?

It is an essentially derived variety. The Act treats a variety as essentially derived when it is predominantly derived from an initial variety while keeping its essential characteristics, is clearly distinguishable from it, and conforms to it except for differences resulting from the act of derivation.

  1. AAn extant variety, because it is available in India
  2. BAn essentially derived variety, because it is predominantly derived from the initial variety, is clearly distinguishable and conforms to it except for differences from the act of derivationCorrect
  3. CA farmers' variety, because it was bred by selection
  4. DAn entirely new variety with no link to the initial variety, because it is distinguishable

Explanation

Section 2(i) requires three things: predominant derivation from the initial variety while retaining its essential characteristics, clear distinguishability, and conformity except for differences from the derivation. All three are met. Being distinguishable alone does not make it unrelated.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Protection of Plant Varieties shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Protection of Plant VarietiesFree diagnostic mock

More Protection of Plant Varieties questions