Skip to content

CMA Final · Strategic Financial Management · Efficient Market Hypothesis

A share's daily price changes over a long period show a serial correlation coefficient close to zero at all lags. A technical analyst claims profits can be made from trend-following rules. The most consistent conclusion under the Efficient Market Hypothesis is that:

Price changes are independent of each other, which supports weak form efficiency and the random walk model. Since past movements do not predict future ones, trend-following technical rules cannot consistently earn abnormal returns after costs.

  1. APrice changes are independent, supporting weak form efficiency and a random walkCorrect
  2. BPrice changes are strongly positive correlated, supporting momentum strategies
  3. CPrice changes are negatively correlated, supporting contrarian strategies
  4. DSerial correlation near zero rejects weak form efficiency

Explanation

Near-zero serial correlation means past price changes carry no information about future changes, which is the random walk and weak form efficiency. Trend-following rules therefore cannot earn abnormal returns. Options on positive or negative correlation contradict the data.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Efficient Market Hypothesis shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Efficient Market Hypothesis questions