CA Final · Direct Tax Laws & International Taxation · Capital Gains
A specified fund, which has duly filed Form No. 178 under Rule 285 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026, earned ₹60,00,000 of capital gains on transfer of shares of an Indian company. These shares were received in relocation from the original fund and the gains would not have been chargeable had the relocation not occurred. The fund held the shares for 300 days with constant daily total assets under management (AUM) of ₹1,000 units. Non-resident (non-PE) unit holders held 40% of AUM for the first 100 days and 60% for the next 200 days. What is the exempt income under Rule 285?
The exempt income is ₹32,00,000. Rule 285 multiplies the gains by the ratio of aggregate daily AUM held by non-residents to aggregate daily total AUM. That ratio is 1,60,000 over 3,00,000, or 8/15, applied to ₹60,00,000. A simple average ignores the unequal periods.
- A₹32,00,000Correct
- B₹30,00,000
- C₹36,00,000
- D₹24,00,000
Explanation
Exempt income = (A × B) / C. B = (400 × 100) + (600 × 200) = 40,000 + 1,20,000 = 1,60,000. C = 1,000 × 300 = 3,00,000. B/C = 8/15, so exempt income = ₹60,00,000 × 8/15 = ₹32,00,000. A simple average of 40% and 60% (₹30,00,000) ignores the different durations, so it is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Capital Gains shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Capital Gains questions
- Meera holds a specified unit linked insurance policy covered by section 2(22)(c) with total premiums of ₹10,00,000 payable over its term. In…
- A specified fund claims exemption under Schedule VI for capital gains on shares of an Indian company received in relocation from the origina…
- Meera holds a specified unit linked insurance policy. In an earlier tax year she received Rs 5,00,000 for the first time against aggregate p…
- A specified fund (resultant fund) transferred shares of an Indian company that it received in relocation from the original fund. Capital gai…
- A non-resident, Mr. Smith, bought shares of an Indian company using US dollars and sold them in the tax year. Under Rule 52 of the Income-ta…
- Zeta Inc., a non-resident, bought shares of an Indian company using US dollars and sold them in the current year. Under Rule 52 of the Incom…