Skip to content

CS Professional · Labour Laws and Practice · Constitution and Labour Laws

A State government plans to enact a law on trade unions and industrial disputes applicable in its territory, while Parliament has already enacted a central law on the same subjects. Under which Schedule and List do these subjects fall, and what is the effect of the repugnancy?

The subjects lie in the Concurrent List of the Seventh Schedule. Under Article 254, a repugnant State law gives way to the central law, unless the State law was reserved for and received the President's assent. So the central law ordinarily prevails over the conflicting State law.

  1. ASeventh Schedule, Concurrent List; the central law prevails over a repugnant State law, unless the State law received Presidential assentCorrect
  2. BSeventh Schedule, State List; the State law prevails in its territory
  3. CSeventh Schedule, Union List; the State has no power to legislate at all
  4. DSeventh Schedule, Concurrent List; the State law always prevails in its territory

Explanation

Trade unions, industrial and labour disputes, and social security are in the Concurrent List (Entries 22, 23, 24). Under Article 254, a repugnant State law is void to the extent of repugnancy, unless it was reserved for and received the President's assent. Hence the central law ordinarily prevails; the State list option is wrong.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Constitution and Labour Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Constitution and Labour Laws questions