CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · Interpretation of Statutes
A statute lists 'cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and other animals' as animals that may not be grazed on a common land. Ravi grazes a herd of elephants on it. Applying the rule of ejusdem generis, what is the position?
Elephants are not necessarily covered. Under ejusdem generis, the general words 'other animals' following a list of specific domestic farm animals are limited to things of the same kind, so they do not automatically extend to elephants.
- AElephants are covered, since 'other animals' includes every animal
- BElephants are not necessarily covered, as 'other animals' is limited to the same class as the listed domestic farm animalsCorrect
- CElephants are covered only if the specific words are ignored
- DThe provision is void for vagueness
Explanation
Ejusdem generis says general words following specific words of a class take meaning from that class. The listed items are domestic farm animals, so 'other animals' means animals of that kind. Option A ignores the specific words.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Interpretation of Statutes shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Interpretation of Statutes questions
- Section 3 of an Act defines 'dwelling' as 'a building used for residence'. Section 9 of the same Act uses the word 'dwelling' in a provision…
- A municipal by-law states: 'No person shall bring any vehicle into the Central Park.' Ravi, a municipal worker, drives an ambulance into the…
- A provision in a taxing statute is capable of two reasonable meanings. One meaning imposes the levy on a transaction; the other leaves it ou…
- A Central Act, effective from a notified date, empowers the Government to make rules. The Act says nothing about when it comes into operatio…
- A statute says: "A tenant who fails to pay rent for two consecutive months shall be liable to eviction." Meera, a tenant, missed rent for on…
- Mehta & Co. LLP was registered with a partner, Kavita, as one of its designated partners. A dispute arises as to whether a clause in the LLP…