FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · The Arbitrage Pricing Theory and Multifactor Models of Risk and Return
A stock has the following Carhart four-factor loadings on excess return: market beta 0.90, SMB -0.20, HML 0.50, momentum (UMD) 0.40. Annual factor premiums are: market 6.0%, SMB 2.0%, HML 3.0%, UMD 8.0%. The risk-free rate is 3.0% and alpha is zero. Next, the analyst drops the momentum factor and uses the three-factor model with the same loadings for the first three factors. By how much does the expected return fall, in percentage points?
Dropping momentum removes its contribution of loading times premium, 0.40 × 8.0% = 3.2 percentage points. Expected return falls from 12.7% to 9.5%, because the other factor contributions are unchanged.
- A3.2Correct
- B5.4
- C0.4
- D8.0
Explanation
Four-factor expected excess return: 0.90×6 = 5.4; -0.20×2 = -0.4; 0.50×3 = 1.5; 0.40×8 = 3.2; total 9.7%, so expected return 12.7%. Three-factor excess return = 6.5%, expected return 9.5%. The difference is the momentum contribution, 0.40×8 = 3.2 points. Option D ignores the loading.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Arbitrage Pricing Theory and Multifactor Models of Risk and Return shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Arbitrage Pricing Theory and Multifactor Models of Risk and Return questions
- A manager claims a positive alpha for a fund based on a single-factor market model. A risk analyst re-estimates the model with additional fa…
- A fund's returns follow a two-factor model: R = alpha + 0.8 F1 + 1.5 F2 + e. The fund is worth USD 200 million. The manager hedges both fact…
- A single-factor APT holds. The risk-free rate is 3% and the factor risk premium is 5%. Stock A has a factor beta of 1.2. What is the expecte…
- A well-diversified portfolio has a beta of 0.8 to a single factor, with a risk-free rate of 2% and a factor risk premium of 5%. The portfoli…
- In the Fama-French three-factor model, which pair of factors is added to the market excess return factor?
- Why does APT conclude that only systematic factor exposure, and not idiosyncratic risk, earns a risk premium?