CS Professional · Advanced Direct Tax Laws and Practice · Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)
A treaty between India and a foreign country defines 'permanent establishment' in its own text. The Income-tax Act, 2025 also contains a differently worded definition of a similar concept. For applying the treaty to an assessee, which meaning governs under section 159?
The treaty's own definition governs. Under section 159(7)(a), a term defined in the agreement carries the meaning given in that agreement. The Act's definition applies only when the agreement does not define the term, so domestic wording cannot override an express treaty definition.
- AThe meaning in the Act, because domestic law always prevails over treaties
- BThe meaning given in the treaty, because a term defined in the agreement has the meaning assigned to it thereCorrect
- CThe meaning given by the foreign country's domestic law
- DThe wider of the two meanings, whichever is more beneficial to the Revenue
Explanation
Section 159(7)(a) provides that where a term is defined in the agreement, it has the meaning assigned in that agreement. The Act's definition or the Central Government's explanation applies only where the agreement does not define the term.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) questions
- Under section 159 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, which description of a 'specified association' is correct?
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, a non-resident assessee wants to claim relief under a notified agreement. Which condition must he satisfy fo…
- Mr. Arvind is resident in India and earns Rs 2,00,000 of foreign-source income in a country with which India has no section 159 agreement. H…
- Mr. Kumar, an Indian resident, earned foreign income from Country X, which has no agreement with India under section 159. He paid tax of ₹60…
- A non-resident company, Alpha Inc., wishes to claim relief under a notified treaty on income arising in India. Which statement is correct un…
- Ramesh, a resident in India, earned foreign income in Country X, with which India has no agreement under section 159. Under the Income-tax A…