FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Art of Term Structure Models: Volatility and Distribution
A Vasicek model has k = 0.25, θ = 4%, and current short rate r0 = 6%. Ignoring risk premium and convexity, what is the expected short rate after 2 years? Use e^(−0.5) = 0.6065.
The expected short rate after two years is about 5.21%. Using the Vasicek formula, the 2% gap between 6% and the 4% long-run level decays by e^(−0.25×2)=0.6065, leaving 1.21%, which is added to 4%.
- A4.79%Correct
- B5.21%
- C5.39%
- D4.00%
Explanation
E[r2] = θ + (r0 − θ)e^(−kt) = 4% + 2% × 0.6065 = 5.213%. Wait: 2% × 0.6065 = 1.213%, giving 5.21%.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Art of Term Structure Models: Volatility and Distribution shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Art of Term Structure Models: Volatility and Distribution questions
- A risk analyst calibrates the Ho-Lee model, dr = λ(t)dt + σ dw, to a term structure of interest rates. Which statement best describes the ro…
- In Model 1 (Ho-Lee-type normal model with constant volatility), the short rate follows dr = λ(t)dt + σdw. Which statement about the distribu…
- A risk manager uses a model where dr = λ(t)dt + σ r dw with σ = 20%. A second model uses dr = λ(t)dt + σ√r dw. Currently r = 4%. Instead of …
- A risk manager increases the mean-reversion speed k in a Vasicek model while holding σ and θ constant. What is the most likely effect on lon…
- A risk analyst compares two one-factor short-rate models. Model A assumes dr = λ(t)dt + σ dw with constant σ. Model B assumes dr = λ(t)dt + …
- A risk analyst at a bank uses the Ho-Lee model, dr = λ(t)dt + σ dw, to price interest rate derivatives. Which statement best describes the r…