Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities

A wealth manager at a private bank recommends a complex structured note with embedded options to a retired client whose stated objective is capital preservation and whose questionnaire shows limited investment experience. Which compliance risk is most directly created by this recommendation?

The main exposure is mis-selling risk. Suitability rules require recommendations to fit the client's objectives, risk tolerance and experience, and a complex structured note sold to an inexperienced client seeking capital preservation breaches that standard, exposing the firm to complaints, redress and sanctions.

  1. AMis-selling risk arising from an unsuitable product recommendationCorrect
  2. BMarket abuse risk arising from use of inside information
  3. CSettlement risk arising from delayed delivery of securities
  4. DModel risk arising from an incorrect pricing methodology

Explanation

Suitability requires that recommendations match the client's objectives, risk tolerance, knowledge and experience. A complex, option-embedded product sold to a capital-preservation client with limited experience is a classic mis-selling situation. The other risks are not triggered by the facts described.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities questions