CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Law relating to Geographical Indications of Goods
A wine maker from a notified convention country has used a GI identifying its wines continuously in its own country for over ten years before 15 April 1994. An Indian association objects that the GI conflicts with an Indian registration. Under the GI Act, 1999, what is the position on continued use?
Continued and similar use is not prevented. Section 84(2) says nothing in the GI Act or Trade Marks Act stops a citizen or domiciliary of a notified convention country from continuing to use a wine or spirits GI used for at least ten years before 15 April 1994, or in good faith before it.
- ASuch continued and similar use is prohibited because the Indian registration prevails in all cases
- BSuch use is allowed only if the maker obtains an assignment of the Indian registration
- CNothing in the GI Act or the Trade Marks Act prevents continued and similar use by that citizen or domiciliary of a notified country identifying wines or spirits, if used continuously for at least ten years before 15 April 1994 or in good faith before that dateCorrect
- DSuch use is allowed only for goods other than wines or spirits
Explanation
Section 84(2) protects continued and similar use by a citizen or domiciliary of a notified convention country for wines or spirits, where used continuously for at least ten years before 15 April 1994 or in good faith before that date. Assignment is in any case barred by section 24, so that option is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Geographical Indications of Goods shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Geographical Indications of Goods questions
- Ravi runs a wholesale shop and lawfully buys sealed boxes of a registered GI sweet from an authorised user. He repacks them into smaller gif…
- In an appeal from an order on an application that WAS opposed, the Registrar does not wish to attend personally. Under Section 35 as reprodu…
- Under Section 2 of the GI Act, 1999, which of the following is a correct reading of the definitions of 'indication', 'name' and 'use'?
- Ravi's unregistered GI for a local spice is copied by a rival, Sahil Exports, who also sells the spice under a deceptively similar name. Rav…
- Darjeeling Tea Growers' Cooperative asks where the particulars of registered authorised users of a geographical indication are recorded. Und…
- A geographical indication was removed from the register for failure to pay the renewal fee. A rival applies six months after removal to regi…