CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Copyrights
A witness living in Chennai is summoned by the Registrar of Copyrights sitting in Delhi. The witness argues that the Registrar's jurisdiction does not extend beyond Delhi. What is the position under the Act?
For enforcing the attendance of witnesses, the local limits of the Registrar of Copyrights' jurisdiction are the limits of the territory of India. A witness in Chennai can therefore be summoned by a Registrar sitting in Delhi.
- AThe Registrar can enforce attendance only within the State where the Copyright Office is situated
- BThe Registrar can enforce attendance only with the consent of the witness's local civil court
- CThe Registrar's local limits for enforcing attendance of witnesses are the limits of the territory of IndiaCorrect
- DThe Registrar cannot summon persons outside the National Capital Territory
Explanation
The Explanation to section 74 says that, for enforcing the attendance of witnesses, the local limits of the Registrar's jurisdiction are the limits of the territory of India. So the Chennai witness can be summoned.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Copyrights shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Copyrights questions
- Mr. Dutta is aggrieved by a final order of the Registrar of Copyrights directing him to pay money. He wants to challenge it. Which statement…
- Sunrise Publications files an application under section 45 for entering particulars of a book in the Register. Which statement correctly des…
- Meera Textiles Pvt Ltd, Surat, owns the copyright in a catalogue of written product descriptions prepared by its staff. It wants particulars…
- In a dispute before the Registrar of Copyrights, Arvind Traders refuses to produce its licence agreement with Kaveri Music Pvt Ltd. The Regi…
- Rohan Designs applies to register a logo, an artistic work that it uses on its garments. Under section 45 of the Copyright Act, 1957, what m…
- The Registrar of Copyrights passes an order directing Mr. Raman to pay Rs 2,00,000 to Ms. Iyer under the Copyright Act, 1957. Raman does not…