IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Economics · Relationship between the government and the individual firm
According to the Coase theorem, under which condition can private bargaining between a polluter and affected parties reach an efficient outcome regardless of who initially holds the property right?
The condition is that transaction costs are low and property rights are clearly defined and enforceable. Then the parties can bargain to the efficient outcome whoever initially holds the right, though the distribution of income differs.
- ATransaction costs are low and property rights are clearly defined and enforceableCorrect
- BThe government sets a uniform tax on all polluters
- CThe number of affected parties is very large
- DThe polluter has monopoly power
- Information about damages is private to the polluter only
Explanation
Coase showed that with well-defined, enforceable rights and negligible transaction costs, parties bargain to the efficient result whichever party holds the right. Large numbers of parties and asymmetric information raise transaction costs, which defeats the result.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Relationship between the government and the individual firm shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Relationship between the government and the individual firm questions
- A regulator imposes a price cap on a natural monopoly using an RPI-X style formula, where prices may rise each year by inflation minus X. Wh…
- Health insurers often face adverse selection in individual policies. Which action by the government best addresses this market failure?
- A competition authority is reviewing a proposed merger between two large private banks in the same city. Which measure is most directly used…
- Which of the following is an example of a firm engaging in collusion that competition law would typically prohibit?
- In health insurance markets, why might private provision lead to under-consumption of vaccination relative to the social optimum?
- Which of the following is the best example of a positive externality that could justify a government subsidy?