CMA Final · Cost and Management Audit · Cost Audit Programme
After the date of the Cost Audit Report, the cost auditor learns of a fact which, if known earlier, would have caused the cost statements to be changed or the report modified. As per SCA 102 application guidance, what should be done regarding documentation?
The fact should be added to the cost audit documentation, and the resulting changes must be reviewed in the same way as the original documentation. The auditor should not ignore it merely because the report was already issued.
- AAdd the fact to the cost audit documentation and review the resulting changes as the original documentation was reviewedCorrect
- BIgnore it, since the report has already been issued
- CDestroy the original documentation and prepare a fresh file
- DRecord it only in the company's cost records, not in the auditor's file
Explanation
Para 6.15 of SCA 102 says such facts should be added to the cost audit documentation, and the resulting changes must be reviewed just like the original documentation. Ignoring them or replacing the file contradicts this.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Cost Audit Programme shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Cost Audit Programme questions
- Which of the following is listed in SCA 102 as one of the additional purposes served by cost audit documentation?
- Cost auditor of Kaveri Polymers Ltd signed the Cost Audit Report on 10 August. On 25 September he learns of a fact that, had it been known e…
- Which of the following is a stated purpose of cost audit documentation under SCA 102?
- Under SCA 105, which of the following correctly describes the preconditions for a cost audit?
- Under SCA 103, when is a Cost Auditing Standard regarded as relevant to a particular cost audit, so that the cost auditor must comply with i…
- Which of the following best describes the 'preconditions for a cost audit' as defined in SCA 105 on agreeing the terms of cost audit engagem…