Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Performance Management · Sustainability

Aldermoor Group wants its management accounting to support integrated thinking. The CFO proposes linking executive bonuses to a single measure, annual profit after tax, while the integrated report claims a strategy of building human and natural capital over ten years. Which is the most significant weakness of this proposal from a performance management viewpoint?

The main weakness is misalignment: an annual profit-only bonus rewards short-term financial results and may encourage managers to erode human and natural capital, contradicting the ten-year multi-capital strategy reported. Integrated thinking requires incentives that reflect the capitals and time horizons in the strategy.

  1. AThe reward measure is short-term and financial, so it conflicts with the long-term multi-capital strategy reported and may encourage managers to erode other capitalsCorrect
  2. BProfit after tax cannot be audited and so cannot be used in reward schemes
  3. CIntegrated reporting prohibits financial measures in executive remuneration
  4. DUsing one measure always makes the scheme too complex to communicate

Explanation

Integrated thinking requires internal measures and incentives aligned to the strategy and capitals reported. A single annual profit measure may reward managers for cutting training or environmental spending, eroding human and natural capital. The other options are false: profit is auditable, the framework does not prohibit financial measures, and a single measure is simple rather than complex.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Sustainability shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Sustainability questions