CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · Interpretation of Statutes
An Act repeals an earlier Act and re-enacts its provisions with changes. Under the General Clauses Act, 1897, which of the following is the correct effect of the repeal, unless a different intention appears?
Repeal does not affect any right, liability or penalty already acquired or incurred under the repealed Act, nor any investigation or proceeding relating to it. Under the General Clauses Act, 1897, these are saved unless the new law shows a different intention.
- AAll pending proceedings under the repealed Act automatically lapse
- BAny penalty incurred under the repealed Act for an offence committed before repeal is wiped out
- CThe repeal does not affect any right, liability or penalty already acquired or incurred under the repealed Act, nor any investigation or proceeding in respect of itCorrect
- DThe repealed Act is treated as never having existed from the date of its enactment
Explanation
The General Clauses Act saves rights, privileges, obligations, liabilities, penalties and pending proceedings under the repealed enactment unless a contrary intention appears. Hence lapse of proceedings or wiping out of penalties (options A and B) is wrong, and the Act is not treated as never having existed.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Interpretation of Statutes shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Interpretation of Statutes questions
- A statute penalises 'any person who sells liquor, wine, beer or other intoxicating drink near a school'. A shopkeeper sells a non-alcoholic …
- A statute says: 'A notice under this Act may be served by registered post.' The department sends a notice by ordinary speed post, which the …
- A statute penalises 'any person who, without lawful authority, removes sand from a river bed'. A company removes sand from a dry canal bed t…
- A statute defines 'dwelling' to 'include a houseboat, a tent and a hut'. Ravi argues that a permanently moored hotel barge is also a dwellin…
- A statute says: 'A trustee shall not sell trust property to himself.' An aggrieved beneficiary argues that the word 'himself' should be read…
- A section of an Act is ambiguous, and Mr Rao argues that the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Bill should decide its meaning. The opp…