FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Portfolio Performance Evaluation
An analyst builds a style benchmark for a manager using style analysis: 70% in Index A (return 10%) and 30% in Index B (return 6%). The manager's actual return was 9.5%. What is the manager's selection return relative to the style benchmark?
The style benchmark returned 0.7 times 10% plus 0.3 times 6%, which is 8.8%. The manager returned 9.5%, so the selection return is 0.7%. Using a single index instead of the weighted blend would wrongly overstate the manager's skill.
- A0.7%Correct
- B1.5%
- C-0.7%
- D3.5%
Explanation
Style benchmark return = 0.7*10% + 0.3*6% = 7.0% + 1.8% = 8.8%. Selection return = 9.5% - 8.8% = 0.7%. Subtracting only Index B (6%) gives 3.5%, which ignores the weights.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Portfolio Performance Evaluation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Portfolio Performance Evaluation questions
- A portfolio has an annual return of 11%, volatility of 10%, and risk-free rate of 3%. The benchmark has a return of 8% and volatility of 16%…
- A portfolio has total volatility of 12%, benchmark volatility of 10%, and a correlation of 0.90 between the portfolio and benchmark returns.…
- A risk committee reviews a manager whose attribution shows consistently large positive selection effects but the manager's stated strategy i…
- Which statement best describes a limitation of single-period Brinson attribution when applied to a portfolio that trades frequently within t…
- A portfolio manager earns an annual return of 9.0% against a benchmark return of 7.5%. The standard deviation of the monthly-annualized acti…
- A fund's benchmark is 50% Sector A and 50% Sector B. The manager holds 50%/50% in the same sectors, so there is no allocation effect. Sector…