IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis · Core concepts of time series models
An analyst fits an ARMA model to monthly claim counts for an Indian insurer and tests residuals. Which finding would most clearly indicate that the fitted model is inadequate?
A Ljung-Box statistic far above the chi-square critical value signals inadequacy. It shows the residual autocorrelations are jointly significant, so they are not white noise and the model has failed to capture the dependence structure in the data.
- AResidual sample autocorrelations lie within roughly plus or minus 2/sqrt(n) at all lags
- BA Ljung-Box (portmanteau) statistic far above the chi-square critical valueCorrect
- CResiduals appear to have constant variance over time
- DA turning point test shows a number of turning points close to its expectation
- A residual histogram that is approximately symmetric
Explanation
A large portmanteau statistic means the residuals have significant joint autocorrelation, so the model has not captured all the dependence. The other options are all consistent with residuals behaving like white noise.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Core concepts of time series models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Core concepts of time series models questions
- A time series process {X_t} is defined as weakly (second-order) stationary. Which set of conditions describes this correctly?
- A time series {e_t} is described as Gaussian white noise with mean zero and variance sigma squared. Which statement about this process is co…
- For which of the following AR(2) processes, X_t = a1 X_{t-1} + a2 X_{t-2} + e_t, is the process stationary?
- For a sample from an AR(2) process, which pattern of sample autocorrelation function (ACF) and partial autocorrelation function (PACF) is mo…
- Which feature of the sample partial autocorrelation function (PACF) would suggest that an AR(2) model is appropriate for a stationary series…
- X_t is a random walk with X_0 = 0 and shock variance sigma squared. For s < t, what is Corr(X_s, X_t) when s = 9 and t = 36?