FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Nonstationary Time Series
An analyst regresses the level of one stock market index on the level of an unrelated commodity price index. Both series are random walks with drift. The regression reports an R-squared of 0.92 and a very large t-statistic on the slope. Which conclusion is most appropriate?
The relationship is likely spurious. When two independent random walks are regressed on each other in levels, the regression often shows a high R-squared and significant t-statistics even though no true relationship exists, because the series are nonstationary.
- AThe relationship is likely spurious, because regressing independent nonstationary series can produce high R-squared and significant t-statisticsCorrect
- BThe relationship is confirmed as causal, because R-squared exceeds 0.90
- CThe result is reliable because large t-statistics offset nonstationarity
- DThe result is reliable provided the sample size exceeds 30 observations
Explanation
Regressing independent unit-root series on each other typically gives inflated R-squared and t-statistics, with residuals that are themselves nonstationary. This is the classic spurious regression problem. Sample size does not cure it, and a high R-squared does not show causality.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Nonstationary Time Series shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Nonstationary Time Series questions
- A series follows Y_t = Y_{t-1} + e_t with e_t white noise. A researcher regresses Y_t on an independent random walk X_t, both of length 500,…
- A researcher runs a Dickey-Fuller regression of the change in Y_t on Y_{t-1} and obtains a coefficient estimate of gamma = -0.04 with standa…
- A trend-stationary series follows y_t = 10 + 0.5t + e_t, where e_t is white noise with variance 4. An analyst removes the trend by regressin…
- A risk analyst runs a Dickey-Fuller test on the log of an equity index price including a constant and a time trend. Compared with a test wit…
- A risk analyst fits a linear trend to a price series that actually follows a random walk with drift. Which is the most likely consequence?
- A log price series is a random walk, so ln P_t = ln P_(t-1) + e_t. An analyst differences the log price series to obtain the series Δln P_t.…