FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Hypothesis Testing
An analyst runs a two-tailed test of a population mean and obtains a p-value of 0.036. Which conclusion is correct?
Reject the null hypothesis at the 5% level but not at the 1% level. The p-value of 0.036 is smaller than 0.05, which supports rejection, but larger than 0.01, so the evidence is not strong enough to reject at the stricter 1% significance level.
- AReject H0 at the 5% level but not at the 1% levelCorrect
- BReject H0 at both the 5% level and the 1% level
- CFail to reject H0 at the 5% level but reject at the 1% level
- DFail to reject H0 at both the 5% and 1% levels
Explanation
H0 is rejected whenever the p-value is below the significance level. 0.036 < 0.05, so reject at 5%; 0.036 > 0.01, so do not reject at 1%. Option C reverses the comparison rule.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Hypothesis Testing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Hypothesis Testing questions
- A risk manager tests H0: mu ≤ 2.0 against H1: mu > 2.0 for the mean of a large sample (n = 100) with known population standard deviation 5.0…
- Daily excess returns of a strategy have a known population standard deviation of 3.0%. A sample of 100 days gives a mean excess return of 0.…
- Using the setting of a 99% VaR backtest over 250 days (expected exceptions 2.5, standard deviation 1.57 under the null), a risk manager obse…
- A sample of 100 monthly excess returns on a fund has a mean of 0.80% and a sample standard deviation of 4.00%. Using the normal approximatio…
- A fund manager claims the standard deviation of monthly returns is 4.0%. A sample of 21 monthly returns gives a sample standard deviation of…
- An analyst tests whether the mean daily return of a fund differs from zero. She sets H0: mu = 0 against H1: mu != 0 and chooses a 5% signifi…