NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-XV: Research Analyst · Qualities of a Good Research Report
An analyst's report on a company says, 'The company will certainly double its profits next year and the stock cannot fall.' Which feature of a good report does this statement violate most directly?
The statement violates the requirement that research be fair, balanced and not misleading. Assuring certain profit doubling or that a stock cannot fall ignores risks and amounts to a guarantee of outcomes, which a good, objective research report must never give.
- AUse of a clear rating scale
- BFair, balanced and not misleading communication, without guaranteesCorrect
- CInclusion of a summary at the start
- DUse of peer comparison
Explanation
Research must be fair, clear and balanced, and must not promise or assure returns or certainty about the future. Words like 'certainly' and 'cannot fall' ignore risks and mislead investors. Summaries and peer comparisons are acceptable features, not violations.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Qualities of a Good Research Report shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Qualities of a Good Research Report questions
- A report on a company uses an EV/EBITDA multiple. Enterprise value is Rs 6,000 crore, with market capitalisation Rs 5,000 crore and cash Rs …
- A report on a mid-size manufacturer states a Buy rating but does not mention key risks such as raw material price volatility and customer co…
- A research report values a company at Rs 840 per share using a target P/E of 24 on estimated EPS. The current market price is Rs 700. What E…
- An analyst values a company at Rs 600 per share using earnings estimates. In the report, the analyst adjusts the stated EPS growth assumptio…
- A research report on a listed company contains a rating, but the analyst's firm acted as merchant banker to the company's public issue withi…
- In a research report, which of the following best reflects the practice of keeping facts separate from the analyst's opinions?