CS Professional · Internal and Forensic Audit · Forensic Audit and Indian Evidence Law
An auditor examines a lease that was witnessed by two people but which the law does not require to be attested. A party wishes to prove it in court. Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, how may it be proved?
It may be proved as if it was unattested. Section 71 provides that an attested document which the law does not require to be attested can be proved like any unattested document, so the Section 67 requirement of calling an attesting witness does not apply.
- AOnly by calling both witnesses
- BOnly by calling one attesting witness under Section 67
- CAs if it was unattestedCorrect
- DIt cannot be proved because it is attested
Explanation
Section 71 says an attested document that is not required by law to be attested may be proved as if it were unattested. Section 67's witness requirement applies only to documents the law requires to be attested, so the witness-based options are wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Forensic Audit and Indian Evidence Law shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Forensic Audit and Indian Evidence Law questions
- During a forensic review at Sharma Textiles Pvt Ltd, the auditor finds a mortgage deed that the law requires to be attested. The deed is bei…
- A document is produced before the Court purporting to be a record of evidence, but it bears no signature of any Judge, Magistrate or authori…
- A will of the late Mr. Dinesh Rao was proved and admitted to probate by a High Court in India. In a later suit about the estate, how may its…
- Meera Textiles Ltd relies on a registered sale deed (not a will) to prove title in a dispute. The counterparty does not specifically deny th…
- In a forgery case, a forensic auditor must prove a document that the law requires to be attested, and it is not a will. The document was reg…
- A forensic auditor's report on a Mumbai firm is to be used in a civil suit. The firm's counsel asks which statute now governs the admissibil…