NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-XV: Research Analyst · Economic Analysis
An economy has a marginal propensity to consume of 0.75 and income tax is a lump-sum amount that does not vary with income. The government increases its spending by Rs 40,000 crore, financed fully by an equal rise in lump-sum taxes. Using the simple Keynesian multiplier model, what is the change in equilibrium income?
Income rises by Rs 40,000 crore. The spending multiplier of 4 adds Rs 1,60,000 crore, but the equal lump-sum tax increase with a multiplier of minus 3 subtracts Rs 1,20,000 crore. The net effect equals the spending change, as the balanced budget multiplier is one.
- ARs 40,000 croreCorrect
- BRs 1,60,000 crore
- CRs 1,20,000 crore
- DRs 0
Explanation
Balanced budget multiplier: government spending multiplier = 1/(1-0.75) = 4, giving +1,60,000 crore. Tax multiplier = -0.75/0.25 = -3, giving -1,20,000 crore. Net change = 40,000 crore, equal to the spending change (balanced budget multiplier is 1). The 1,60,000 figure ignores the tax effect.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Economic Analysis shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Economic Analysis questions
- Which of the following is generally classified as a lagging economic indicator?
- Under a flexible inflation targeting framework in India, what is the mandated inflation target for the Monetary Policy Committee, and the to…
- Which statement best describes the effect of a cut in the RBI repo rate, other things remaining equal?
- An economy has a marginal propensity to consume of 0.75 and the government raises spending by Rs 10,000 crore while simultaneously raising l…
- Which combination of policy actions by the Reserve Bank of India would be most consistent with a contractionary monetary stance aimed at cur…
- In the context of the business cycle, which group of indicators is best suited to signal a turning point in economic activity before it actu…