IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Finance · Personal and corporate taxation
An individual has a capital loss on the sale of a long-term asset in a year. Under the general approach to capital loss set-off in Indian income tax, which is correct?
A long-term capital loss may be set off only against long-term capital gains, and any unabsorbed balance can be carried forward for later years. It cannot be set off against salary or business income, so the other statements are wrong.
- AA long-term capital loss can be set off only against long-term capital gains, and unabsorbed amounts can be carried forwardCorrect
- BIt can be set off against salary income of the same year
- CIt can be set off against any income including business profits
- DIt is lost permanently if not used in the same year
- It can be set off against short-term gains only
Explanation
Long-term capital losses are restricted to set-off against long-term capital gains, and any balance can be carried forward for a limited number of years. They cannot reduce salary or business income.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Personal and corporate taxation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Personal and corporate taxation questions
- Rohan, a resident individual, sells a house property for ₹90 lakh, incurring transfer expenses of ₹1 lakh. He bought it years ago for ₹40 la…
- Bharat Metals Ltd has a 10% pre-tax cost of debt on its borrowings and pays corporate tax at 25%. Interest is fully deductible. What is the …
- A progressive tax is one where the average tax rate rises with income. Which of the following structures is progressive?
- Rahul sells a capital asset for Rs 15,00,000. He paid Rs 9,00,000 to buy it and spent Rs 50,000 on improvements and Rs 30,000 on brokerage o…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd has taxable profit of ₹50 lakh for the year and an effective corporate tax rate of 25% on it. It pays interest of ₹10 …
- Which factor most directly limits the benefit of increasing debt to exploit the interest tax shield?