IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Rational choice theory and utility
An individual has utility U(w) = 1 - e^(-0.01w) with w in rupees thousands. What are the absolute risk aversion A(w) = -U''(w)/U'(w) and the behaviour of A as wealth rises?
Absolute risk aversion is constant at 0.01. The first derivative is 0.01e^(-0.01w) and the second is -0.0001e^(-0.01w), so their ratio is 0.01 whatever the wealth. Exponential utility therefore exhibits constant absolute risk aversion.
- AA(w) = 0.01 for all w; constant absolute risk aversionCorrect
- BA(w) = 0.01w; increasing absolute risk aversion
- CA(w) = 1/w; decreasing absolute risk aversion
- DA(w) = 0.01/w; decreasing absolute risk aversion
- A(w) = 0.01e^(-0.01w); decreasing absolute risk aversion
Explanation
U' = 0.01e^(-0.01w), U'' = -0.0001e^(-0.01w). Therefore A = 0.0001/0.01 = 0.01, independent of w. This is the exponential (CARA) utility.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Rational choice theory and utility shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Rational choice theory and utility questions
- An investor has utility U(w) = -e^(-0.02w), with w in Rs lakh. What is her coefficient of absolute risk aversion and how does it change as w…
- An individual has utility U(w) = ln(w) and faces a 50:50 gamble giving final wealth of Rs 4,00,000 or Rs 1,00,000. What is the certainty equ…
- An investor has utility U(w) = w - 0.0005 w^2 (w in Rs thousands, in the range where U is increasing). What is her coefficient of absolute r…
- Which statement about an investor with a strictly concave utility function who is offered a fair gamble (expected gain zero) is correct?
- Under expected utility theory, an individual with utility function U(w) is said to be risk averse if, for any non-degenerate gamble on wealt…
- Which statement about the Arrow-Pratt measures of risk aversion is correct?