CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Demands and Recovery
An Input Service Distributor of Arjun Group distributed credit in contravention of section 20, so that Ruchi Ltd, one of the recipients, received excess credit of Rs 90,000. How is the excess credit recovered under section 21 of the CGST Act, 2017?
The excess credit of Rs 90,000 is recovered from the recipient, Ruchi Ltd, along with interest. The amount is determined by applying section 73 or section 74 or section 74A, as the case may be, mutatis mutandis, as provided in section 21.
- AFrom the recipient, Ruchi Ltd, with interest, applying section 73 or 74 or 74A, as the case may be, mutatis mutandis to determine the amountCorrect
- BOnly from the Input Service Distributor, with no recovery from the recipient
- CFrom the recipient without interest, by simple adjustment in the electronic credit ledger
- DFrom the recipient only through a civil suit outside the Act
Explanation
Section 21 provides that the excess credit is recovered from the recipients along with interest. The provisions of section 73 or 74 or 74A apply mutatis mutandis to determine the amount. Recovery solely from the distributor, or without interest, contradicts the section.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Demands and Recovery shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Demands and Recovery questions
- Meridian Pharma has an order under section 73(9) for a period within 1 July 2017 to 31 March 2020, with tax of ₹8,00,000, interest of ₹2,00,…
- Shree Ganesh Pvt Ltd has a notice under section 73(1) for tax of Rs 6,00,000 for the period April 2018 to March 2019. No order under section…
- Shivalik Services, an Input Service Distributor, distributed credit in contravention of the prescribed distribution provisions, resulting in…
- Kaveri Textiles received a notice of demand for Rs 8,00,000 as tax, and filed an appeal. The appellate authority reduced the Government dues…
- Ravi Traders received an order under section 73(9) for the period 2018-19. It then filed no appeal and has no writ petition pending. A notif…
- Anand Pharma Ltd. received a section 73 notice for 2019-20 and, before the notified date, filed an appeal that is still pending before the A…