Skip to content

NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-X-A: Investment Adviser (Level 1) · Ethical Issues

An investment adviser has two clients with identical risk profiles. He identifies a limited allotment in an attractive bond issue. Which allocation approach best reflects the ethical principle of fair treatment of clients?

He should allocate pro rata under a predetermined, documented policy applied equally to eligible clients. Fair treatment means no client is favoured for fees or personal reasons, and a written policy makes the allocation transparent and verifiable.

  1. AAllocate the entire quantity to the client paying the higher advisory fee
  2. BAllocate to his own family account first and then to clients
  3. CAllocate pro rata based on a predetermined, documented policy applied equally to eligible clientsCorrect
  4. DAllocate to the client who first responded to his call this morning, ignoring suitability

Explanation

Fair dealing requires that clients with similar profiles are treated equitably, using a predetermined and documented allocation policy. Favouring higher-fee clients or himself creates conflicts and unfairness. Ignoring suitability also breaches the duty to recommend appropriate products.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Ethical Issues shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Ethical Issues questions