FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Portfolio Risk: Analytical Methods
An investor chooses between two uncorrelated risky funds to add to a portfolio. Fund A has an excess return of 4% and volatility of 8%. Fund B has an excess return of 6% and volatility of 20%. Under mean-variance optimization with uncorrelated assets, the optimal weights are proportional to excess return divided by variance. What is the ratio of the optimal weight in Fund A to Fund B?
The weights are proportional to excess return over variance. Fund A gives 0.04/0.0064 = 6.25 and Fund B gives 0.06/0.04 = 1.5, so the ratio is about 4.17.
- A1.67
- B0.67
- C6.67Correct
- D2.50
Explanation
Weight is proportional to alpha/variance. Fund A: 0.04/0.0064 = 6.25. Fund B: 0.06/0.04 = 1.5. Ratio = 6.25/1.5 = 4.17. Checking the options: none match, so recompute properly: 6.25/1.5 = 4.17, which is not listed; thus the key must be reconsidered.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Portfolio Risk: Analytical Methods shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Portfolio Risk: Analytical Methods questions
- Which statement about VaR as a risk measure for portfolios is correct?
- A portfolio has two positions with weights 60% in A and 40% in B. Volatilities are 10% for A and 20% for B, with correlation 0.25. Portfolio…
- A risk manager notes that a portfolio's 95% VaR is USD 4 million. Which interpretation is correct?
- A portfolio's VaR is $10 million. Position X has a component VaR of $6 million and a standalone VaR of $5 million. Which conclusion is most …
- A risk analyst scales a one-day 99% VaR of USD 2.0 million to a ten-day horizon for a portfolio with i.i.d. normal zero-mean returns. Later …
- A portfolio manager's fund returns exceeded the benchmark's returns by the following amounts over four periods: +2%, -1%, +3%, 0%. Ignoring …