Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk, Regulation and Organizational Structure

An investor is reviewing a hedge fund's organizational structure. The fund's prime broker also acts as its custodian, and the fund's sole auditor is a small unknown firm. Which change would most improve protection of investors' assets from fraud?

Using a reputable independent auditor and independent custody, or multiple prime brokers, best protects against fraud because it provides third-party verification that assets exist and are reported accurately. Co-investment, shorter lock-ups or higher hurdles do not independently confirm holdings or counter weak audit and custody arrangements.

  1. AUse a reputable independent auditor and ensure assets are verified by an independent custodian or multiple prime brokersCorrect
  2. BIncrease the manager's personal co-investment in the fund
  3. CShorten the lock-up period for new investors
  4. DRaise the performance fee hurdle rate

Explanation

Asset misappropriation and fabricated reporting are mitigated by independent verification: a reputable auditor and independent custody or diversified prime brokerage with third-party confirmation. Co-investment aligns incentives but does not verify assets, and lock-ups and hurdle rates do not address custody or audit weakness.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk, Regulation and Organizational Structure shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk, Regulation and Organizational Structure questions