Skip to content

CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Administrative Laws

An officer hears a licensee fully but his superior, who never attended the hearing, writes and signs the cancellation order. The best-supported objection under natural justice is that:

The objection is that the person who decides must be the person who hears. The superior signed the cancellation without attending the hearing, so the decision-maker did not hear the licensee. This breaches the fair hearing requirement, and the order can be quashed.

  1. AThe person who decides must be the one who hearsCorrect
  2. BThe licensee was not allowed legal representation by default
  3. CThe order was not published in the Gazette
  4. DThe hearing should have been held in public

Explanation

The principle that he who decides must hear means the authority passing the order must have heard the party. Here a different person decided without hearing. Legal representation is not an automatic right, Gazette publication is not a natural justice requirement, and administrative hearings need not be public.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Administrative Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Administrative Laws questions