CS Professional · Internal and Forensic Audit · Audit and Investigations
An SFIO investigating officer arrests a person during an investigation under the Companies Act, 2013. Which safeguard must be followed?
An arrested person must be told the grounds of arrest and be produced before the Special Court or a judicial magistrate within twenty-four hours, excluding travel time. The Act provides no seven-day detention, and no ratification by the company's board is needed.
- ANo safeguard is required because the arrest is part of the inquiry
- BThe person must be informed of the grounds of arrest and produced before the Special Court or magistrate within twenty-four hours, excluding travel timeCorrect
- CThe person may be detained for seven days before being produced anywhere
- DThe arrest becomes valid only after the company's board ratifies it
Explanation
The Act permits arrest by the authorised SFIO officer only where there is reason to believe the person is guilty of a specified offence, and requires the grounds to be communicated. The arrested person must be taken before the Special Court or judicial magistrate within twenty-four hours, excluding journey time. A seven-day detention or board ratification has no basis in the Act.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Audit and Investigations shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Audit and Investigations questions
- Under the fraud triangle, a finance manager at Bharat Agro Pvt Ltd steals cash because he has heavy gambling debts, knows reconciliations ar…
- At Kaveri Textiles Ltd, the accounts clerk Ramesh prepares vendor payments, also approves new vendor creation and reconciles the bank statem…
- An internal auditor at Himalaya Pharma Ltd finds these: (1) a purchasing officer who has not taken leave for four years and lives beyond app…
- An investigator at Ganga Infra Ltd. has completed fieldwork on suspected diversion of funds. Interviews and documents show loss of ₹48 lakh,…
- Sagar Steels Ltd. engages a forensic auditor after a whistle-blower complaint on diverted funds. The auditor's report is likely to be challe…
- During a forensic review of suspected vendor payment fraud at an Indian manufacturing firm, the forensic auditor finds that the original inv…