CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Competition Law
Anand Foods Ltd, a dominant enterprise, found to have abused its dominant position, had turnovers of Rs 400 crore, Rs 500 crore and Rs 600 crore in the last three preceding financial years. Under section 27(b), what is the maximum penalty the Commission can impose on it?
The maximum penalty is Rs 50 crore. Section 27(b) allows up to ten per cent of the average turnover of the last three preceding financial years, and the average of 400, 500 and 600 crore is 500 crore, so ten per cent is 50 crore.
- ARs 40 crore
- BRs 50 croreCorrect
- CRs 60 crore
- DRs 150 crore
Explanation
Section 27(b) caps the penalty at ten per cent of the average turnover or income of the last three preceding financial years. Average = (400+500+600)/3 = Rs 500 crore; 10% = Rs 50 crore. Rs 60 crore wrongly uses only the latest year's turnover.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Competition Law shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Competition Law questions
- Zenith Appliances sells washing machines to a distributor on the condition that the distributor must also buy a specified quantity of its de…
- Regarding the Competition Commission of India's status and working under the Act, which statement is correct?
- Zenith Pharma and Kaveri Labs notified a proposed merger to the Competition Commission of India. The Commission formed the opinion that the …
- The Commission is inquiring into a complex abuse of dominance matter involving pricing economics. It wishes to take expert help in the inqui…
- Which of the following correctly describes the Commission's duties relating to competition advocacy under the Competition Act, 2002?
- The Commission has been superseded by a notification under section 56 of the Competition Act, 2002. Which of the following is NOT a conseque…