CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Overseas Direct Investment
Ananya Pharma Ltd contravenes a FEMA rule on a quantifiable transaction of Rs 40 lakh, and the contravention is not a continuing one. On adjudication under Section 13(1), what is the maximum penalty?
The maximum penalty is Rs 1.2 crore. Section 13(1) permits a penalty up to thrice the sum involved when the amount is quantifiable, and thrice Rs 40 lakh equals Rs 1.2 crore. The Rs 2 lakh limit applies only to unquantifiable amounts.
- ARs 40 lakh
- BRs 1.2 croreCorrect
- CRs 2 lakh
- DRs 80 lakh
Explanation
Section 13(1) allows a penalty up to thrice the sum involved where the amount is quantifiable. Three times Rs 40 lakh is Rs 1.2 crore. Rs 2 lakh applies only when the amount is not quantifiable. Rs 40 lakh uses a single multiple, and Rs 80 lakh uses twice the sum, both wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Overseas Direct Investment shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Overseas Direct Investment questions
- During an inspection of an authorised dealer bank under Section 12 of FEMA, the RBI officer asks the bank's directors to produce books and d…
- Rohan Mehta is found to have acquired foreign security situated outside India, of aggregate value exceeding the threshold prescribed under t…
- During an inspection of an authorised dealer bank, a Reserve Bank officer specially authorised in writing asks the bank's directors to produ…
- Kaveri Industries Ltd. made an overseas investment and breached a FEMA direction. The sum involved in the contravention is quantifiable at R…
- An Indian company has made a direct investment abroad and later needs foreign exchange to pay amortisation of a loan or for depreciation of …
- Arvind Textiles Ltd, an Indian company, remits Rs 40 lakh abroad in breach of a FEMA rule. The amount involved is quantifiable. Under Sectio…