CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement
Anil Engineering filed Application A in India on 1 April. Another applicant, Bharat Motors, filed Application B on 1 July claiming the same invention, and Application A is published on 1 October after Application B is filed. Under Section 13(1)(b), what must the examiner of Application B investigate in relation to A?
The examiner must check whether B's invention is claimed in another Indian complete specification published on or after B's filing date and dated before, or claiming priority earlier than, that date. Application A, filed 1 April and published 1 October, fits this prior-claim test under Section 13(1)(b).
- AWhether B is claimed in any complete specification published on or after B's filing date, filed in India and dated before or claiming an earlier priority date than B's filing dateCorrect
- BWhether A was anticipated by publication in a foreign journal only
- CWhether A's specification was published before 1 January 1912
- DWhether Application A has been granted a patent
Explanation
Section 13(1)(b) requires the examiner to ascertain whether the invention is claimed in any claim of another complete specification published on or after the applicant's filing date, filed in India and dated before or claiming a priority date earlier than that date. A, dated 1 April and published 1 October, fits this description for B filed 1 July. Grant of A is not the test.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement questions
- Meera Textiles Pvt Ltd files a patent application in Chennai for a new dyeing process. Two years later she realises nobody has asked for exa…
- Veda Pharma sues Kiran Labs for infringing its process patent. Kiran Labs, in its written statement, argues that the patent is liable to be …
- Veda Pharma Ltd sues Kiran Labs for infringing its process patent. Kiran Labs argues that the patent is liable to be revoked on one of the g…
- Dev Agro filed an application and the applicant made no request for examination within the prescribed period; no secrecy direction was issue…
- Rohan Pharma Pvt Ltd filed a patent application. A competitor, Sanjay Labs, which is an interested person and not the applicant, wants the a…
- Arjun Tools sues Bharat Fabricators for patent infringement. Bharat proves that when it made the infringing sales it was not aware and had n…