Skip to content

CS Professional · Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Law and Practice · Group Insolvency

Anil Textiles Ltd and its subsidiary Anil Yarns Ltd are both in CIRP with different resolution professionals. Anil Textiles holds the main plant, while Anil Yarns holds the licences needed to run it. Bidders say that a plan for only one entity has little value. Which benefit of a coordinated group approach is most directly illustrated?

The facts illustrate value maximisation. Because the plant and the licences held by different group companies are complementary, bidders see value only in a combined solution. Coordinated group handling allows interdependent assets to be resolved together, which is the core reason for a group insolvency framework.

  1. AElimination of the moratorium for the subsidiary
  2. BMaximisation of value by allowing a combined resolution of interdependent assetsCorrect
  3. CAutomatic exemption from the committee of creditors
  4. DReduction of the insolvency commencement date to the same day by law

Explanation

The plant and licences are complementary, so value is realised only when they are dealt with together. Coordination enables a combined plan. The moratorium and committee of creditors are not removed by coordination.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Group Insolvency shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Group InsolvencyFree diagnostic mock

More Group Insolvency questions