CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · Conciliation Proceedings and International Perspective of Conciliation
Arbitral proceedings between Shreeji Pharma and Dev Logistics commenced in June 2014. In 2017, Dev Logistics filed a court application relating to those arbitral proceedings. There is no agreement between the parties on the applicable law. Under Section 87, how are the amendments of 2015 treated for this court proceeding?
The amendments do not apply. Section 87 excludes them from court proceedings arising out of or relating to arbitral proceedings that commenced before 23 October 2015, irrespective of whether the court proceedings began before or after that date. The 2017 filing date is therefore irrelevant.
- AThey apply, since the court proceeding was filed after 23 October 2015
- BThey do not apply, since the court proceeding arises out of arbitral proceedings commenced before that date, even though filed laterCorrect
- CThey apply only if the court first holds the arbitration invalid
- DThey apply to the extent that the court thinks fit
Explanation
Section 87(a)(ii) excludes the amendments from court proceedings arising out of or in relation to such earlier arbitral proceedings, whether the court proceedings were commenced before or after 23 October 2015. Filing in 2017 therefore does not attract the amendments.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Conciliation Proceedings and International Perspective of Conciliation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Conciliation Proceedings and International Perspective of Conciliation questions
- Mehta Exports Ltd (Mumbai) and Orion Trading GmbH (Hamburg) are in a dispute over a supply contract. Mehta sends Orion a written invitation …
- Sundaram Textiles and Kaveri Dyes accepted in writing an invitation to conciliate a payment dispute. While the conciliation is in progress, …
- Meera Textiles Ltd and Kaveri Dyes Pvt Ltd are in conciliation over a supply dispute. After three meetings, the conciliator, having consulte…
- Meridian Textiles Pvt Ltd and Kaveri Dyes Ltd attempted conciliation over a supply dispute, which failed. Meridian then began arbitration. I…
- Patel Motors invited Rathi Components in writing to conciliate a dispute. Rathi Components has not replied for 35 days and the invitation fi…
- Kiran Exports invited Lal Engineering in writing to conciliate. Lal Engineering did not reply for thirty days. Which statement is correct?