CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Trademarks
Arjun, a licensee of a registered mark, is only a permitted user and is not a registered user. He finds a counterfeiter selling goods under the mark. Which statement is correct?
Arjun cannot institute infringement proceedings, since a mere permitted user has no such right under the Act. Only a registered user may sue for infringement in his own name, by making the registered proprietor a defendant.
- AHe may sue in his own name as if he were the proprietor
- BHe may sue only after making the proprietor a defendant
- CHe has no right to institute any proceeding for infringementCorrect
- DHe may sue for infringement but not for passing off
Explanation
Section 53 provides that a permitted user who falls under section 2(1)(r)(ii) has no right to institute infringement proceedings. Section 52 gives that right only to a registered user, who must add the proprietor as defendant.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Trademarks shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Trademarks questions
- Meenakshi Textiles Pvt Ltd, an Indian company, is alleged to have falsely applied a registered trade mark to goods, an offence for which the…
- Sundar Sweets Pvt Ltd is held to have committed an offence under the Trade Marks Act. Rajan, a director, proves that the offence was committ…
- Arjun, a citizen of a non-Contracting State, has no domicile in any Contracting State, but runs a small bona fide manufacturing unit in Indi…
- Anand Textiles, registered proprietor of 'ANAND SILK' with its business in Surat, sues in a District Court in Surat for infringement by a Ja…
- Lakshmi, a registered user of a mark owned by Orion Foods Ltd (Chennai), carries on business in Jaipur. Subject to any agreement between the…
- Arjun Foods registered the mark 'CRUNCHO' for namkeen. A rival, Bhavna Snacks, sells namkeen under an identical mark 'CRUNCHO'. In an infrin…