Skip to content

CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Board's Accountability on ESG

Arjun Pharma Ltd wants to align senior management pay with sustainability outcomes. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee proposes that part of the variable pay of the CEO depend on verified reductions in workplace injuries and emissions intensity. Which assessment of this proposal is most sound?

The proposal is sound. Tying part of variable pay to measurable, verifiable ESG metrics such as injury rates and emissions intensity aligns executive incentives with long-term value. Pay is not limited to profit, targets should be overseen by the Board, and ESG performance can be measured.

  1. AAppropriate, as linking part of variable pay to clear, measurable and verifiable ESG metrics ties incentives to long-term valueCorrect
  2. BInappropriate, since remuneration may only depend on financial profit
  3. CAppropriate only if the targets are kept confidential from the Board
  4. DInappropriate, since ESG metrics cannot be measured

Explanation

Linking a portion of variable pay to clear, measurable and verifiable ESG metrics is a recognised way to align incentives with long-term sustainable performance. The other options wrongly restrict pay to profit, demand secrecy from the Board, or claim ESG cannot be measured.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Board's Accountability on ESG shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Board's Accountability on ESGFree diagnostic mock

More Board's Accountability on ESG questions