CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Indian Patent Law and its Developments
Arjun reads the present Section 162 and looks for sub-sections (2) and (3). What does the official text show about them?
Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 162 have been omitted with effect from 20-5-2003. The current section therefore consists of sub-sections (1), (4) and (5), and Arjun will find no operative text in the omitted numbers.
- AThey are in force and deal with pending applications
- BThey have been omitted with effect from 20-5-2003Correct
- CThey were substituted by the Finance Act in 2005
- DThey are replaced by a proviso to sub-section (1)
Explanation
The footnote states sub-sections (2) and (3) were omitted by s. 66 of the amending Act with effect from 20-5-2003. They are not in force, substituted or turned into a proviso.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Indian Patent Law and its Developments shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Indian Patent Law and its Developments questions
- Kavita Pharma's convention application in India was filed with a complete specification claiming a development of its Singapore-filed invent…
- Anita Rao, an unregistered person, is convicted for the first time of holding herself out as a patent agent in contravention of section 129.…
- Meera Iyer, a non-registered consultant, only gives clients advice of a purely scientific or technical nature on how a competitor's product …
- Meera Labs files a convention application in India. The Controller asks to see the foreign specification, and the applicant's basic applicat…
- A student argues that Section 162(1) repeals the whole Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911, including its provisions on designs. Which resp…
- Meera Labs files a convention application in India. It has made an earlier application for the same invention in a convention country and th…