Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Management · Separate legal personality, directors' duties, shareholders and partnerships

Arjun Sharma, a director, transfers the valuable assets of his debt-ridden company, Sharma Logistics Ltd, to a new company he controls, solely to defeat a creditor's pending decree. The creditor asks the court to disregard the corporate structure. Which approach is a court most likely to take?

A court is most likely to lift the corporate veil. Separate legal personality is not absolute, and where a company is used as a device to evade an existing legal obligation or defraud a creditor, the court looks through the structure to the persons behind it.

  1. ALift the corporate veil, as the separate entity is being used as a device to evade existing legal obligationsCorrect
  2. BRefuse to lift the veil, because separate personality is absolute and never set aside
  3. CDissolve both companies automatically without any hearing
  4. DTreat the creditor as a shareholder of the new company
  5. Hold only the company's auditor liable for the transfer

Explanation

Courts lift the veil where the company form is a sham or used to evade existing obligations or defraud creditors. Separate personality is strong but not absolute. Automatic dissolution and making the creditor a shareholder have no legal basis.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Separate legal personality, directors' duties, shareholders and partnerships shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Separate legal personality, directors' duties, shareholders and partnerships questions