CA Foundation · Business Laws · The Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Asha, Binu and Chetan are partners in a firm at will, with no agreement on how long it will last. Asha serves written notice on the other partners saying the firm stands dissolved from the date of the notice. Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, what is the position?
The firm is dissolved from the date stated in Asha's notice. In a partnership at will, any partner may dissolve the firm by giving written notice to all the other partners, and no consent, court decree or minimum notice period is required.
- AThe firm is dissolved from the date mentioned in the notice, as any partner of a firm at will may dissolve it by giving noticeCorrect
- BThe firm cannot be dissolved unless all partners agree
- CThe firm is dissolved only after a court passes a decree
- DThe firm is dissolved only after three months from the date of the notice
Explanation
A firm at will may be dissolved by any partner giving written notice to all the other partners of the intention to dissolve it. Dissolution takes effect from the date mentioned in the notice, or from the date of communication if no date is mentioned. No consent of the others or a court order is needed, and there is no fixed notice period.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 questions
- In a partnership between Vikram and Divya, Vikram contributes Rs. 5,00,000 as capital and Divya contributes Rs. 3,00,000. The partnership de…
- Arun, Bela and Chetan are partners in a firm formed for a fixed term of 5 years. After 2 years, Arun wants to end the firm because he is tir…
- Meera, Nikhil and Obaid run a firm in Pune. Meera, without consulting anyone, retires from the firm by giving notice, and the partnership ha…
- Sagar, Tina and Umesh are partners. Umesh is adjudicated insolvent. Which statement correctly describes the effect on the firm and on Umesh'…
- Neha, Omkar and Pranav carry on business under a partnership deed that has no clause on retirement. Neha wants to retire while the firm is a…
- Pooja and Qadir are partners. Rohan is admitted as a new partner on 1 January. A creditor claims Rs 80,000 from Rohan for goods supplied to …